• @Zess
    link
    262 months ago

    Probably thinks it’s just a normal servant or slave, not a sexual one.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 months ago

        To my understanding, that’s the way ancient Romans viewed it. For lack of more delicate and concise words, it manly to top, unmanly to bottom. Gay sex was acceptable if the sexual roles reflected their social roles.

      • @ZeffSyde
        link
        32 months ago

        Huh, kind of like the rough and ready good ol boys from Deliverance showing those soft city boys what was what.