I told myself I wasn’t gonna do it anytime soon but I distro hopped from Endeavour OS to Arch with Hyprland in the span of 3 days. Nothing against endeavour. I just tried to customize, broke some stuff and decided to try Hyprland again. I’m quite liking it. It takes awhile to get used to it but it’s fun. I cloned a repo for a customized version of it. I don’t know how long I’ll stick with it but wish me luck!

  • @Qpernicus
    link
    English
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • @Raphael
      link
      English
      -22 years ago

      But some packages did

      So Arch broke for you.

      • @Qpernicus
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • @Raphael
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          When a package is not working as it was intended, the distribution is said to be broken, at least for that package. This is the Debian definition.

          The arch definition is “my bad, jk, it’s not arch’s fault lmao”

      • Aki
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I like the aggression on “fanboying Arch,” while there’s you cherry picking stuff when they’re literally mentioning git packages.

        • @Raphael
          link
          English
          02 years ago

          He said “some of them”, meaning not all packages that broke were -git.

          • Aki
            link
            English
            12 years ago

            I know, but did you ever ask what those packages are? Are they dependencies? Are the packages that broke came from Arch User Repository? Somehow, you immediately ruled out PEBKAC? I don’t know, you’re a Linux user, this stuff is pretty basic no? I don’t get the anti-fanboyism.