The Wikipedia definition seems to indicate it has origins as a racist term and I’ve never understood why unix users have adopted this terms instead of something benign like “themes” or “theming” which I remember being in use long before I ever heard “rice”. So what gives? Why use “rice” instead of “theme”?

  • dedale
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    The language used is not going to harm people. The intent is, which was my point.

    Read -> Parse the meaning -> React accordingly. Is a correct way to communicate.
    Read -> React to trigger word -> Disregard meaning Is not. It’s just conditioned response.

    If you do not think disagreement is a productive contribution, maybe you’re not looking for a discussion.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Let me get this straight:

      In the following scenario, the app developer is in the right?

      • App dev: Here’s my new app! It’s called F----T, for FAntastic Gnome Game On Terminal.
      • Me: Hey, that word is offensive to me and others like me, it’s a word we hear before being beaten, bullied, killed, or discriminated against. Do you think you could change it?
      • App dev: No. My intent was not to discriminate. You’re being unreasonable.
      • Me: The fact that you are unwilling to even entertain changing the app name from a well known slur used against people like me makes me feel completely unwelcome.
      • App dev: Sounds like your problem, sticks and stones.
      • @nitefox
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        Difference being that rice is not an insult per se, which means that using the term rice isn’t inherently racist.

        To my (very obvious) thesis: “Uee Mario, pizza mare mandolino!” Isn’t racist, each of those words are innocent and have no negative meaning, yet it is racist as fuck

        Checkmate to whatever you were trying to prove

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          I was responding to the argument in the previous comment, not making a point about the term “rice.”