• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    -22 days ago

    Then why did you fill your comment with everything about Biden?

    It seems weird, if your goal was to evaluate Kamala Harris. It seems perfectly on-message if your goal was to criticize the Democrats using whatever came to hand.

    The election’s over, so I don’t see the purpose in getting in a long argument with you about it. But criticizing Kamala Harris because she didn’t stop Netanyahu is about as stupid as criticizing Biden because he didn’t stop Trump from causing inflation that hit us in 2021 and 2022. And, I suspect, the reasons behind it are the same.

    • @GrymEdm
      link
      8
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I filled the post with Biden because I was talking about US policy. Under Biden. Which is applicable to the original article’s premise that now the brakes are gone, when I argue they weren’t there. Was I supposed to say “Kamala sent billions in aid to Israel” etc? Regardless of whether I said Kamala or Biden, the #'s and scope of the ethnic cleansing with US bipartisan complicity is the same.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        -12 days ago

        I know that you have a narrative that Biden was able to suspend arms without congress or the American public raking him over the coals for it, maybe cancelling him and sending aid anyway as they did when Trump tried to hold aid for Ukraine. And that none of his piss-poor diplomatic resistance had any impact, and Kamala Harris was exactly the same and wouldn’t have formed any kind of brakes on Netanyahu, even when compared with Trump’s enthusiastic approval.

        The thing is, none of that is true. For more information, you can read the article.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            -42 days ago

            Yes, I’ve heard your narrative. It’s wrong. For more, figure out a way to read the article, or otherwise learn what it is saying and why from some other source.

            If you just want to keep repeating what you already think, find someone else to do it at, please. I heard it the first time you typed it.

            • @GrymEdm
              link
              3
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              There is no way I know of to read the article. I’ve given several provable examples over month’s worth of time for my points . You could at least provide an excerpt that would negate the preponderance of evidence I’ve provided.