madthumbsM to LinuxsucksEnglish • 4 days agoIt's the users, not the architectureimagemessage-square10arrow-up17arrow-down128
arrow-up1-21arrow-down1imageIt's the users, not the architecturemadthumbsM to LinuxsucksEnglish • 4 days agomessage-square10
minus-squareJackGreenEarthlinkfedilinkEnglish3•edit-24 days agoI mentioned Krita, lol, and even if I hadn’t there’s no reason to assume GIMP, the most unintuitive piece of software to grace our desktops.
minus-square@CrayonRosarylinkEnglish2•3 days agoKrita is not a good photo editor. It’s missing a ton of photo editing features compared to GIMP or Photoshop. The target demographic is digital painters.
minus-squareJackGreenEarthlinkfedilinkEnglish2•3 days agoI guess I mostly edit my photos with AI, so Krita is sufficient for my needs, but I take your point.
minus-squaremadthumbsOPMlinkEnglish-2•4 days agoKrita is an art / painting program. -Not designed for photo editing. It’s also from KDE so expected to be buggy: https://www.qwant.com/?q=krita+buggy&t=web Some of us just want to get work done instead of tolerate and trouble shoot *admittedly buggy foss software.
I didn’t mention GIMP
You didn’t mention a photo editor.
I mentioned Krita, lol, and even if I hadn’t there’s no reason to assume GIMP, the most unintuitive piece of software to grace our desktops.
Krita is not a good photo editor. It’s missing a ton of photo editing features compared to GIMP or Photoshop. The target demographic is digital painters.
I guess I mostly edit my photos with AI, so Krita is sufficient for my needs, but I take your point.
Gimp is fine
Krita is an art / painting program. -Not designed for photo editing. It’s also from KDE so expected to be buggy: https://www.qwant.com/?q=krita+buggy&t=web
Some of us just want to get work done instead of tolerate and trouble shoot *admittedly buggy foss software.