And I’m being serious. I feel like there might be an argument there, I just don’t understand it. Can someone please “steelman” that argument for me?

  • @candybrie
    link
    1
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    More people than the Republicans would. And then I would vote Republican. Because that’s the choice on election day.

    Edit: if all you’re doing is not voting, you do nothing to help anyone. If you are actually helping in meaningful ways, then voting to pick the easier opponent does not undermine your work.

    • @surph_ninja
      link
      03 months ago

      There’s absolutely no logical reason to believe that. Democrats have escalated war on three fronts with nuclear armed superpowers, and armed a genocide.

      • @candybrie
        link
        0
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        There are the words straight out of Trump’s mouth. If you believe that Democrats will kill more people than Republicans, that’s a completely different conversation. Though it still mostly boils down to: genocide or worse genocide, pick one, and if you don’t pick, you’re likely to get worse genocide.

        • @surph_ninja
          link
          -13 months ago

          You believe the only options are versions of genocide, because you are in a MAGA death cult.

          • @candybrie
            link
            13 months ago

            What’s the other outcome of the US election?

            • @surph_ninja
              link
              -13 months ago

              Recognize that it is a farcical, illegitimate charade. You know, the only logical conclusion when you’re told you’re not allowed to choose no genocide.

                • @surph_ninja
                  link
                  13 months ago

                  Seems like it might be for millions of people who didn’t show up to the polls. Sure feels like the outcome.

                  • @candybrie
                    link
                    13 months ago

                    No. The outcome is Trump is president.