• @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
    link
    15
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    If you tell someone that X is wrong, that just makes them X harder.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactance_(psychology)

    The use of more concrete, low-controlling language, and the restoration of freedom through the inclusion of a choice-emphasizing postscript, may offer the best solution to reducing ambiguity and reactance

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 days ago

        There’s lots. A pretty easy example:

        Person 1: I like my truck Person 2: I prefer my EV, trucks consume too much fuel.

        P1: trucks have to consume so much fuel because that’s what makes them powerful P2: but most people don’t need that much power, trucks are unnecessary.

        P1 (feeling attacked, goes into a defensive mentality): I need a truck and lots of other people do too. (Continued rationalizations of why trucks are necessary) P2 (unmoved in their opinion): I still don’t think they’re necessary for the average person.

        P1: (further rationalizations as to the everyday benefits of a truck) P2 (still unmoved in their opinion)

        P1 successfully convinced themselves of the benefits of owning a truck.

        This is will known to marketing too. Most vehicle advertising is not to get you to buy a (insert vehicle here), but instead, get those with (insert vehicle here) to be so proud of how great their car is, that they convince you to buy (insert vehicle here).

        • @captainlezbian
          link
          43 days ago

          Oh I meant of your alternative suggestion. I definitely know that exchange lol