Tech leaders’ politics are encoded into their platforms – and with Trump’s ascent, they have direct access to the Oval Office

All of the disinformation about corrupt vote counts turned out not to be necessary, as Donald Trump won the election decisively. But the election proved that disinformation is no longer the provenance of anonymous accounts amplified by bots to mimic human engagement, like it was in 2016. In 2024, lies travel further and faster across social media, which is now a battleground for narrative dominance. And now, the owners of the platforms circulating the most incendiary lies have direct access to the Oval Office.

Content moderation at these platforms now reflects the principles of the CEO and what that person believes is in the public’s interest. The political opinions of tech’s overlords, like Musk and Zuckerberg, are now directly embedded in their algorithms.

For example, Meta has limited the circulation of critical discussions about political power, reportedly even downranking posts that use the word “vote” on Instagram. Meta’s Twitter clone, Threads, suspended journalists for reporting on Trump’s former chief of staff describing Trump’s admiration of Hitler. Threads built in a politics filter that is turned on by default.

  • VanonEnglish
    2•1 month ago

    For me, it’s probably the interaction with (intelligent, educated, creative, talented) people that are outside of normal reach. And I can turn these virtual people on or off at any time (lol).

    • @Cocodapuf
      2•1 month ago

      it’s probably the interaction with (intelligent, educated, creative, talented) people

      Heh, yeah I bet there are some of those people on the socials.

      • VanonEnglish
        2•1 month ago

        Journalists, historians, professors, scientists, artists, etc. What you see (on these non-algorithmically controlled networks like Bluesky or early Twitter) is directly determined by who you follow. Unfollow or block/mute the dumbasses. Follow the best.