@rpgmemes

Some players are on MinMax overdrive

  • @Archpawn
    link
    52 days ago

    Call it what you want. By RAW, it’s a DC 15 Dexterity saving throw to avoid damage regardless of the size of the falling creature (beyond that if it’s tiny it does no damage at all). And that’s assuming you’re playing with the optional rules for creatures falling on other creatures causing damage.

    • @cryptiod137
      link
      English
      22 days ago

      I’ve seen that rule before. They didn’t carry it forward into the new rules, and for good reasons.

      • @Glytch
        link
        22 days ago

        That rule comes from Tasha’s Cauldron of Everything which is compatible with the 2024 update so it’s still a valid RAW interpretation according to WOTC.

        • @cryptiod137
          link
          English
          11 day ago

          They carried forward all the other optional rules from Tasha’s, and not the that one. Clearly they didn’t like something about it.

          • @Glytch
            link
            223 hours ago

            They didn’t carry Artificers forward into the new PHB but they’re still a valid class. This rule not being in the newest books only means it didn’t need modification to fit with the new material not that it is no longer valid.

            2024 is not a new version that completely replaces 2014, it’s an update where things stay the same unless they’re mentioned in the newer material, hence all the official adventure books being compatible with 2024.

            • @cryptiod137
              link
              English
              219 hours ago

              I’d agree in general, but they copied the other rule about falling into liquid off the same page from Tasha’s without modifications and not the rules for falling onto other creatures.

              They specifically chose not to have those rules when it would have been no effort to add them.

              And they did update falling, by adding the section about falling into liquid, and describing it as a hazard.

              That signals to me they very clearly did not want those rules as the new baseline for the game.

              • @Glytch
                link
                23 hours ago

                That’s a valid argument. I still disagree, but I can see your point.