Low Quality [email protected] • 3 months ago

Probably should've marked this NSFW

237

Probably should've marked this NSFW

Low Quality [email protected] • 3 months ago

Chat

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
22•3 months ago
There’s little legislative language for banning furry porn that wouldn’t also ban Winnie the pooh
- @[email protected]
  link
  fedilink
  13•3 months ago
  “The president shall appoint a furry porn expert who will determine what is and isn’t furry porn”
- JackGreenEarth
  link
  fedilink
  English
  2•3 months ago
  Genitals is one. But banning furry porn would be stupid anyway.
  - @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4•3 months ago
    deleted by creator

Low Quality [email protected]

[email protected]

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

A community dedicated to the lowest quality facts.

While the community is named after the mastodon account Low Quality Facts it is not required to post related to that account. As long as the post is low enough quality, it belongs in this community.

A low quality fact could be a few things:

Something blatantly untrue but stated as a fact
Something true but stated in a way that makes it sound made up
Something so blatantly obvious it doesnt need to be said at all.

Examples:

“Louis Armstrong stored jelly beans in his trumpet, which he would discreetly eat during his performances.”

“If you took a persons digestive system and stretched it out end to end, it would hurt a lot.”

“Whales are notoriously bad trumpet players.”

Posts can be in whatever form best displays the low quality fact.

RULES

1: Be civil. No racism or any of that non-sense

2: Only low quality facts!

1 user / day
5 users / week
414 users / month
3.18K users / 6 months
563 subscribers
75 Posts
393 Comments
Modlog

mods:
Maven (famous)