• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    310 hours ago

    What if he burned down every house within 50 miles and the landscape didn’t recover for decades? What if it happened again and again?

    • Track_ShovelOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      What if we constantly subsidized industries that made our climate unlivable?

      Nuclear is a sound option. We already deal with mining wastes that must be managed in perpetuity. Nuclear waste isn’t much different in that regard.

      Your point about landscapes also happens in mining.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -39 hours ago

        Yes, we should be moving to solar instead of propping up uneconomic polluting industries like nuclear or coal.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 hours ago

          Doing something because it’s the “most economical” is why we have a climate catastrophe on our hands. Plus solar can’t actually provide steady power on it’s own and never will be able to. Exotic nation wide energy storage solutions do not exists at our current level of technology. Instead solar/wind has to be offset by natural gas power plants.

        • Track_ShovelOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 hours ago

          I fully support solar and wind but I don’t think it’s a one size fits all at this point. I think solar needs to get a lot more efficient and better to cover all the applications that oil and gas and coal do.

          Even renewables need mining (sadly) which has significant impacts.

    • @Passerby6497
      link
      English
      310 hours ago

      What if instead of scary magic rocks that release bad juju, what if we went back to the burney rocks that also put out even more bad juju than the scary rocks and makes the sky fairies mad and fired up? That would protect us from the scary event, even if it was much worse long term.