• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    189 hours ago

    I have to deal with similar issues in my neighbourhood; any service vehicle will have to block the bike lane because that houses driveway is already full of vehicle.

    • @grue
      link
      English
      358 hours ago

      Service vehicle never “have” to block the bike lane. They could simply block the general purpose lane instead.

      In other words, they are making a deliberate choice to fuck cyclists’ safety in order to prioritize convenience for car drivers.

      • @HappycamperNZ
        link
        English
        37 hours ago

        I think you’re attributing malice to laziness.

        I cant think of a single courier or delivery driver that would actively think “let me take an extra 20 seconds to reverse into this driveway just to fuck with bikes”. They just want to get it done and get to the next

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -26 hours ago

        Well…yes, in most areas that inconveniences 3 people vs 300. Bicyclists, despite their entire personality being geared around it, are not by default better or more valuable than people driving cars.

        • @grue
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          What cyclists are more of, compared to people driving cars, is vulnerable, which means they’re more important to protect – by not blocking bike lanes and forcing them to mix with car traffic, for example!

    • Daniel QuinnOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      138 hours ago

      Curious how it never occurs to them to block the driving lane, or you know, park around the corner.