• @Kbobabob
    link
    English
    03 hours ago

    Nobody needs religion.

    • Saik0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 hours ago

      Religion isn’t the need. Social interaction and the feeling of belonging and belief are the needs. Religion can and does fill that for many.

      And before you attack me, I’m atheist.

      • @PapaStevesy
        link
        English
        21 hour ago

        But other things can and do too, so religion isn’t necessary. That’s the point.

        • Saik0
          link
          fedilink
          English
          131 minutes ago

          Nobody said it was. Just that it does meet some needs.

          Until you somehow convince those who have those needs that religion isn’t the correct way to meet those needs, you’re not going to get anywhere screaming that religion isn’t necessary. Those people firmly believe it is as it meets those needs for them and don’t have something else to do so.

      • @PapaStevesy
        link
        English
        32 hours ago

        Painting baby toys with lead was pretty popular for awhile, so was filling your house with asbestos. Don’t confuse popularity with necessity, you might get cancer.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          The lead paint and the asbestos both served a need. For colored toys and insulation, specifically. And then we found a better way to serve that need. It isn’t a dumb need.

          Don’t assume that everybody who sees things differently is an idiot.

          • @PapaStevesy
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            I didn’t call anyone an idiot, I just made the point that something being popular in society doesn’t even make it good for society, much less necessary. Just look at fentanyl, or network primetime television.