🍹Early to RISA 🧉M to [email protected] • 1 month agoAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1511arrow-down151
arrow-up1460arrow-down1imageAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉M to [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink49•1 month ago How is that “dehumanizing” when human is literally in the explanation. Had it been “female apeoid” I’d have agreed, but humanoid… So “moid” for male humanoid is “dehumanizing” too? “A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
“A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid
A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
I stand corrected. Thank you for the explanation. 👍
graceful. props to you.
more people should be like this.