@[email protected] to MoviesEnglish • 4 hours agoAccording to the Wall Street Journal, "Wicked" Parts One and Two cost $320 million ($160 million per film). Both parts were shot back-to-back.lemmy.mlimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up128arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up128arrow-down1imageAccording to the Wall Street Journal, "Wicked" Parts One and Two cost $320 million ($160 million per film). Both parts were shot back-to-back.lemmy.ml@[email protected] to MoviesEnglish • 4 hours agomessage-square9fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@MrVilliamlinkEnglish20•4 hours agoIt really grinds my gears that they took a movie-length two act play and padded it out to chop it up into two movies. And they’ll be rewarded for it. Together, they’ll gross over $1.5 billion, maybe over 2.
minus-square@NOT_RICKlinkEnglish19•4 hours agoYou really think this is going to do gang busters? I’m not even convinced it will make the money back
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•3 hours agoMaking films isn’t free, they have to have expenses. What do you want them to do, reduce the spending on the money laundering?
It really grinds my gears that they took a movie-length two act play and padded it out to chop it up into two movies. And they’ll be rewarded for it. Together, they’ll gross over $1.5 billion, maybe over 2.
You really think this is going to do gang busters? I’m not even convinced it will make the money back
Making films isn’t free, they have to have expenses. What do you want them to do, reduce the spending on the money laundering?