@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • 12 hours agoAccording to the Wall Street Journal, "Wicked" Parts One and Two cost $320 million ($160 million per film). Both parts were shot back-to-back.lemmy.mlimagemessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up143arrow-down13file-textcross-posted to: movies
arrow-up140arrow-down1imageAccording to the Wall Street Journal, "Wicked" Parts One and Two cost $320 million ($160 million per film). Both parts were shot back-to-back.lemmy.ml@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • 12 hours agomessage-square11fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: movies
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 hours agoMusicals are massively popular. People go to them to get drunk and sing along too loud, and maybe have a fight.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-22 hours agoI have no problem with musicals. Wicked was published in 1995. Making this movie might have made sense up to 2009, but now? It’s a sentimental cash-grab. Same reason they’re making Gladiator 2.
Musicals are massively popular. People go to them to get drunk and sing along too loud, and maybe have a fight.
I have no problem with musicals.
Wicked was published in 1995. Making this movie might have made sense up to 2009, but now? It’s a sentimental cash-grab. Same reason they’re making Gladiator 2.