@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 months agoWhat's the most obscure distro you can think ofmessage-square196fedilinkarrow-up1123arrow-down19
arrow-up1114arrow-down1message-squareWhat's the most obscure distro you can think of@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 months agomessage-square196fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•2 months agoIt’s an ancient divide in parts of the FOSS community that believes copyleft licenses are not “free” because they force you to license contributions under the same license.
minus-square@gruelinkEnglish5•edit-22 months agoYeah, I know, but I would’ve expected a distro that describes itself as “GNU/Linux-libre” would fall on the other side of it!
minus-squarecqst [she/her]linkfedilink1•2 months agoNo one thinks this. Even permissively licensed BSD operating systems package GPL software and accept it as Free Software.
It’s an ancient divide in parts of the FOSS community that believes copyleft licenses are not “free” because they force you to license contributions under the same license.
Yeah, I know, but I would’ve expected a distro that describes itself as “GNU/Linux-libre” would fall on the other side of it!
No one thinks this. Even permissively licensed BSD operating systems package GPL software and accept it as Free Software.