• @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28 hours ago

    This is an issue with browsers, not Linux. RAM usage will be lower on Linux than on Windows.

    • madthumbsOPM
      link
      English
      -48 hours ago

      ItS nOt LiNuX fAuLt! - Yeah, the rest of the world is just moving to fast for them.

      • @[email protected]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 hours ago

        I’m so confused. If Linux uses less RAM at idle than Windows, wouldn’t it be better choice for systems with low RAM?

        • madthumbsOPM
          link
          English
          -58 hours ago

          Wouldn’t an android phone be a better choice? Wouldn’t an older air-gapped Windows version be a better choice? Wouldn’t using a Library computer be a better choice? Wouldn’t a type-writer be a better choice? Wouldn’t going out and making some money for something better be a better choice?

          • @[email protected]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            48 hours ago

            For some use cases, yes those would be better choices. Since your original post talks about “breathing new life” I’m assuming we’re talking about computers that are too old to recieve Windows updates or are too slow to be used with bloated Windows. In those cases, instead of throwing the device out, installing Linux is a good choice since it has lower RAM requirements, allowing you to open more browser tabs.