• AFK BRB Chocolate
    link
    English
    881 month ago

    You know, for this whole election cycle, many, many people have been commenting on the parallels between Trump/MAGA and the rise of the Nazi party. It hasn’t just been people on social media, there have been lots of well cited articles. Take a look at this Guardian piece from the summer.

    So yes, the parallels are so significant that it makes people wonder if it’s coincidental or a playbook.

    • Don_DickleOP
      link
      English
      211 month ago

      In your honest opinion do you think he will try to get rid of voting so he can remain in power like Hitler did?

      • AFK BRB Chocolate
        link
        English
        351 month ago

        I’ll be surprised if he lives long enough for that - he’s old and has a terrible diet - but he said at a fundraiser that people would only need to vote one more time, which many took to mean that’s all he’d need to stay in power. He tried a failed coup in 2020, so clearly doesn’t care if it’s lawful or not. Would anyone be surprised?

      • @Treczoks
        link
        English
        1530 days ago

        I would definitely not put it beyond him. The only thing that could really prevent this would be his death. Be glad that Trump is way older than Hitler was in 1933.

      • @samus12345
        link
        English
        1330 days ago

        He doesn’t need to. Elections will happen as usual, but states with Republican-led governments will report favorable results for Republicans regardless of the reality.

      • @enbyecho
        link
        English
        1130 days ago

        We are already well along the road of elections being fairly meaningless. Not because the results aren’t counted accurately but because elections can be swayed by numerous mechanisms including voter suppression (voter ID laws, redistricting, restrictions on polling places and methods, etc) and propaganda. Combine that with economic suppression via wealth inequality that results in low-information voters being the norm and you have a relatively easy mechanism to “win” elections that’s legal and constitutional.

        Hitler didn’t get into power by being a dictator, he became one through a series of events. The Reichstag fire was a pretext Hindenburg declaring a state of emergency which not only gave Nazi’s the ability to frame and dissent or opposition as traitorous, it also lent “credence” to their propaganda about the threat of communism, allowing them to further consolidate power in the 1933 election.

        History rhymes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        730 days ago

        Absolutely. If Trump dies till then someone else will just take over. America wont have free elections for decades to come.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        The scary thing is that Republicans have the holy political trinity right now. Control of the executive as well as both legislative branches. They could easily pass an amendment to nix the 22nd.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          30 days ago

          That’s not how the amendment process works. They’d need a 2/3 majority vote in both the House and the Senate to launch a proposal or 2/3 of the states to hold a constitutional convention; once the amendment is proposed, 3/4 of the states would have to ratify it.

          Besides, even a simple majority requirement wouldn’t guarantee success - for example, see the clown show for the GOP House speakership, Senators Manchin (I; D before 2024) and Sinema (I; D before Dec 2022) voting no on various Democratic initiatives, or Senator McCain (R) voting no on the ACA repeal.

          There was actually a point where we were two state governorships away from the GOP being able to hold that convention, but that’s still just the proposal.

          • Fontasia
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            30 days ago

            He’s got the supreme court on his side, what stopping him making up just forcing things through as emergency measures?

            • @samus12345
              link
              English
              6
              edit-2
              30 days ago

              Nothing. The Supreme Court has no oversight whatsoever and can rule that anything is legal (or illegal) with no way to challenge it.

          • @TheOtherThyme
            link
            English
            230 days ago

            It doesn’t matter how things are should work or how they used to work. Nothing and no one will stop the repugs from doing anything they want.