Putin signs new Russian nuclear doctrine after Biden's arms decision for Ukraine
apnews.com
President Vladimir Putin has signed a revised nuclear doctrine declaring that a conventional attack on Russia by any nation that is supported by a nuclear power will be considered a joint attack.

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/28311786

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday signed a revised nuclear doctrine declaring that a conventional attack on Russia by any nation that is supported by a nuclear power will be considered a joint attack on his country.

The signing of the doctrine, which says that any massive aerial attack on Russia could trigger a nuclear response, reflects Putin’s readiness to threaten use of the country’s nuclear arsenal to force the West to back down as Moscow presses a slow-moving offensive in Ukraine.

  • @Gradually_AdjustingEnglish
    5•1 month ago

    Bold of you to assume Russia can nuke anybody. Putin would have to do a lot of talking to explain why they had to nuke Ukraine when the war is going sooo great according to all the state media. He isn’t invincible even in Moscow. And if they hit anyone else, then it’s pretty much all over but the crying for all of us.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
      4•1 month ago

      I appreciate this comment because it’s the one thing that might stop Russia. It’s not going to be nuclear deterrence, it’s going to be internal and external pressure.

      I don’t trust Putin to be rational though and neither should anyone else.

      • @Gradually_AdjustingEnglish
        3•1 month ago

        Kinda it. He’s set up his government to operate like an organized crime syndicate, so our best hope at the moment is to weaken them by degrees and wait for a more risk-averse (or at least more realistic) power player to usurp him.

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
          2•1 month ago

          I think counting on a coconspirator to become rational and brave is a hope. He’s president for life though and lives in a literal villain lair. Miles of impassible mountains with one way in patrolled by heat seaking drones and all matter of radio and seismic sensors, and an frigid ocean patrolled by everything up to nuclear submarines on the other. I’d put about as much faith in it as I would waiting around for natural causes or a jilted lover, a disgruntled chef, or whatever dumb luck might bring the world closer to peace.

          To add to this, I think Russia has already committed to losing at least ten million people if hot war breaks out, and for Putin that would be like no big deal if it got him a good enough strategic advantage, whether it’s pushing back NATO or undermining democracy. That is to say, I hope it won’t take an utter humanitarian catastrophe to rock Putin’s goons hard enough to turn on him.

          • @Gradually_AdjustingEnglish
            2•1 month ago

            Agreeing again - all we have is hopes at this point, as far as I can see.

              • DennisEnglish
                1•1 month ago

                By the way, interestingly related rule in the sidebar of this community:

                *Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

              • @[email protected]M
                1•1 month ago

                Read the message. Didn’t listen to it. Your gripes are out of scope. Take this to another community specifically there to discuss your issues. Might I suggest [email protected]

                Also, (edit: AFAIK) that post was not deleted by a mod or admin. It was edited to say Permanently Deleted and deleted by the user.