• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Point 1, exactly my pount, that’s exactly what you did. I demonstrated that to you and now we agree. You’ll notice I keep grounding us in the comments under discussion: “I think your argument is this” and “how does that have relevance to the original comment”. Every accusation is a confession.

    Point 2, exactly what you did when you tried labeling my argument a strawman. Ev-ery accusation is a confession.

    Who is talking about ignoring people.

    Me, continually about you. You ignored the original answer to your question. You ignore my explanation to why it’s a valid answer. You ignore my pointing out you ignoring people to ask who’s talking about ignoring people.

    How are you quantifying[…]

    You argue semantics to steer the conversation away from the original question. E-v-e-r-y accusation is a confession.

    Again I have to point out…

    1 you haven’t until now pointed out that you havent made an arguement. 2 it is absurd to do so. 3 you are a meme

    You are quoting something that was never said

    It’s a summary, I made that quite plain.

    • @UsernameHere
      link
      23 hours ago

      Still no response to the original question of ‘How do we win elections without/with less donors’?

      I’ve played along with your avoidance of the question and all its led to is a discussion of semantics and nothing about the original topic. Seems like that is your intent.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        As demonstrated we have been led here by you. You haven’t played along with my avoidance of this question, I wasn’t originally asked this question. I pointed out that you ignored their answer and then you got all accusey and semanticky.

        Remember when you wanted to make a distinction between “donors” and “money”, you sure dropped that in a hurry. Every accusation is a confession.

        Still no response…

        Doesn’t respond to a single thing in any previous comment. Every accusation is a confession. This is also just a bald faced lie.

        And for whatever reason they keep doubling down on refusing to do voter outreach and listening to what Dem voters want. Current leadership will never back away from the strategy of:

        In the original comment you replied to. They could have done more outreach to determine what dem voters want by wasting less money elsewhere. Reality is you don’t listen to yourself, let alone anyone else. I am over it. Thanks for proving to me, yet again, that talking to American liberals is futile. I can’t dig you out of your dogma at all.

        • @UsernameHere
          link
          11 hour ago

          You’re still dancing around a simple question.