• lurch (he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 month ago

    Bombing a few prominent military installations in NK could teach their leader a valuable lesson and cause dissent among his sheeple. They probably think they can be safe while joining the war and need a wake up call

    • @Maalus
      link
      English
      121 month ago

      And then they bomb SK in retaliation and cause a huge mass casualty event, along with a war in Asia.

      • lurch (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        Why would they retaliate against SK when the US, Europe or Ukraine bomb them for basically attacking Ukraine. That would be useless.

        • @Maalus
          link
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Because they hold SK hostage with the amount of artillery they have. Same for SK holding NK hostage. It’s a mexican standoff that has been in place for decades. Once you start attacking NK, they have nothing to lose. So they make the decision to attack them an even costlier one.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 month ago

            To be fair they never moved their artillery location since forever, SK could steam roll over them faster than desert storm, they aren’t afraid of NK winning, they are afraid of them losing and SK fucking their economy for a hell hole full of malnourished and ignorant people with their entire world revolving around their worshiping their leader, bombing Kim Jong-un would be faster tho, but they would have to put a puppet government there for decades

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      Nah, their leader don’t give a shit for their population, if something killing the leader would be more efficient