SSTF to [email protected] • 1 month agoIt's insidiousimagemessage-square59arrow-up1518arrow-down13cross-posted to: tenforward
arrow-up1515arrow-down1imageIt's insidiousSSTF to [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square59cross-posted to: tenforward
minus-squareDeconceptualistlinkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-21 month agoIt’s not TIFF. This isn’t NASA imagery. PNGs do alright on compression for photos. (at least I hope NASA hasn’t captured images of Quark)
minus-squarePhoenixzlinkfedilink2•1 month agoPNG can zip but it’s lossless, joh can lose data, and the difference is very significant
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-230 days agoTIFF is also such a hot mess when it comes to picking the correct subformat because there are so many options for compression available, some of them FOSS, some of them proprietary. Edit: … and most of them quite dated.
It’s not TIFF. This isn’t NASA imagery. PNGs do alright on compression for photos.
(at least I hope NASA hasn’t captured images of Quark)
PNG can zip but it’s lossless, joh can lose data, and the difference is very significant
TIFF is also such a hot mess when it comes to picking the correct subformat because there are so many options for compression available, some of them FOSS, some of them proprietary. Edit: … and most of them quite dated.