@[email protected] to solarpunk [email protected]English • 6 days agoThe masculine urge to nuclear project postingslrpnk.netimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1385arrow-down125
arrow-up1360arrow-down1imageThe masculine urge to nuclear project postingslrpnk.net@[email protected] to solarpunk [email protected]English • 6 days agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•6 days agoAfaik that is not an economically viable option.
minus-square@FoshezelinkEnglish18•5 days agoFrance literally does that. They reprocess 96% all of their used fuel back into usable fuel and useful materials.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•5 days agoThe number is false. You make a confusion between what could be recycled and what is actually recycled. And MOX is not a good option (expensive, 1 cycle, toxicity).
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•6 days agoWhich part? France is basically doing this already.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•5 days ago Economically it’s not interesting It’s one cycle only Waste in output is even worst and more toxic
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•5 days agoclutches pearls won’t someone think of the stock market?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•5 days agoIf destroying the planet weren’t economically viable, no one would do it. This has been your daily depressing fact.
Afaik that is not an economically viable option.
France literally does that. They reprocess 96% all of their used fuel back into usable fuel and useful materials.
The number is false. You make a confusion between what could be recycled and what is actually recycled. And MOX is not a good option (expensive, 1 cycle, toxicity).
Which part? France is basically doing this already.
clutches pearls won’t someone think of the stock market?
Ah yes, economically viable like destroying the planet.
If destroying the planet weren’t economically viable, no one would do it.
This has been your daily depressing fact.
My point exactly.