Even if it wasn’t so much “manipulative”.

  • @AntifaTeamLead
    link
    1251 month ago

    I have and will continue to make a small number of obvious omissions or minor misspellings in my work when I submit it to my bosses for review. Not in the majority of my work, but mostly when they may have some resistance or hesitation on a course of action or a part of the project.

    If I can trick them into contributing to the project by fixing or improving it, they end up feeling ownership of it in a way they wouldn’t have otherwise. I do this on purpose, and turn a hesitater into a champion of the work. It’s our project now!

    • @sunbrrnslapper
      link
      531 month ago

      I ask leading questions that make people think an idea is theirs. Business people love their own ideas. A woman’s? Not so much.

        • @sunbrrnslapper
          link
          229 days ago

          Yeah, it is a bummer. But at this point, I’m old and used to it, and this is the fastest way to get traction on my ideas. 🤷

    • @Jimbabwe
      link
      331 month ago

      That’s kinda genius ngl

      • @voracitude
        link
        141 month ago

        This is an example of “managing up”. It requires understanding people well, a particular weakness of mine.

    • fmstrat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 month ago

      Oddly enough I have done this in reverse to Jr members of my team. Amazing the engagement you get when they catch something they see as obvious, and thanking them brings up moral.

      • @TheDoozer
        link
        291 month ago

        In this case it’s “morale.”

        Waaaaaaaait a minute…

      • @AntifaTeamLead
        link
        71 month ago

        It’s a win-win for everyone. Plus, if the person misses the obvious thing, you know what not to trust them with in the future!