What an A-hole. Guess he can’t afford a saw.

And those damn screws.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 day ago

    No shit, we have those too, but they obviously cost more so it’s not as common. And that doesn’t counter the fact that in most locations, the code is to put the nice side facing out. Again, this is the point of contention, not whether a fence with two nice sides exists. Try to keep up buddy, if you can.

    The picture is taken in the USA, if you want to join a discussion about fences in the States, then don’t interject your country’s rules. They don’t apply.

    • @SchmidtGenetics
      link
      English
      -4
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      There is no codes that say that, maybe local bylaws, but to say code is just pathologically and factually wrong.

      But feel free to provide the code that says this, if you can find it, you kind of need to support asinine claims like that.

      Also nothing about this picture or anything OP said has claimed to be from the USA, but even than, the model US building code has absolutely no specifications about what side a fence “faces”.

      You realize CODES are entirely structural and would NEVER have a stipulation, like that yeah…?

      So don’t confuse a local municipal bylaw/ordinace, with “code”, they a fundamentally different things, but of course a laymen like you would never understand a nuance like that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        When you finally resort to semantics to counter, you know you’ve lost, but… not only that, you’re absolutely wrong! Zoning codes are what state which way a fence must face. Lmao, how many more Ls you want to take buddy? Confidently incorrect again!

        • @SchmidtGenetics
          link
          English
          0
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          And still doesn’t link any, what a shocker.

          And it’s not semantics, I know codes don’t state it, and local ordinances do, and idiots like you conflate them which makes any intellectual conversations about it nigh impossible.

          It’s always funny seeing a lamen talk so confidently about something they have no actual understanding about.

          But sure “codes” state that, so let’s see one than, please. So I can show exactly what you’re conflating as “code”.

            • @SchmidtGenetics
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              15 minutes ago

              Your link is broken, but I can see it’s a PDF and its name, so I can tell that’s not by any stretch of the definition a code.

              But I pulled up the “ordinance” that it likely would be referring (which still isn’t a “code”), and would you look at that, not one mention about what side it should “face”.

              So again, laymen with absolutely zero understanding and this is the exact shit I’ve been taking about. You can’t even link the right thing, and it’s not even a code lmfao. But sure insult me to show how correct you are….