• m-p{3}
    link
    fedilink
    454 days ago

    At least it’s a dismissal without prejudice which leaves the door open for charges to be brought back once Trump is no longer in office and as long as the statute of limitation hasn’t run out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      234 days ago

      leaves the door open for charges to be brought back once Trump is no longer in office

      Assuming his lard-ass lives that long.

    • @RememberTheApollo_
      link
      144 days ago

      You know how the courts love putting rich old white dudes behind bars, right?

      Assuming of course we don’t end up with a Republican dictatorship after this presidency, then it’s all meaningless anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      134 days ago

      A glimmer of hope, but at least, of the extremely limited options, this one leaves a shred of hope behind.

      Still fucking awful and a complete condemnation of the justice system in the US, but POC in the States have known that for years, now it’s just whitey getting shown how fucking biased it is to privilege and wealth.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      124 days ago

      I can’t say I’m feeling overly optimistic about anything worthwhile happening with this case after 9 years, when they failed to move forward in nearly 5

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 days ago

        How is “less than 4” now “nearly 5”?

          • Ech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -13 days ago

            What “argument”? It’s just doomer moaning, using hyperbole to amplify their own defeatism. I’m just pointing out the bs.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              03 days ago

              It’s not “doomer moaning” to think that if they didn’t prosecute him in the four year period after his presidency that they won’t do it eight or twelve years after his presidency when he’s either dead from old age or well into his 80s.

              That’s not defeatist it’s simply witnessing the actions of our current leadership and believing them. You can choose to believe their words instead, but there’s zero reason to when their actions (both past and current) directly contradict them.

              • Ech
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -13 days ago

                It’s not “doomer moaning”

                It is when they’re lying about the time that’s already passed. They’re clearly more interested in embellishing than being realistic.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      94 days ago

      Who’s going to revive a 10 year old political case against an 83 year old that’s retiring from politics? In the US?

      • m-p{3}
        link
        fedilink
        84 days ago

        He cannot pardon himself on a dismissed case.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Again, who is going to stop him? The presidential pardon is wide reaching, and no one has ever tried to pardon themselves before so there’s no legal precedent. You think this supreme court is gonna stop him?

          Also, he absolutely can pardon for something that was dismissed. Nixon got pardoned for something he was never even charged with.

          • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 days ago

            Fun mental excersise:

            Even if the president can’t pardon themself. They could just temporarily declare themselves inable to perform the powers and duties of the presidency, then the VP becomes Acting President, and the VP as Acting President can pardon the President. Voila, its not a self-pardon.

            Shenaigans… Shenanigans…

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
          link
          fedilink
          English
          74 days ago

          He could. The president can pardon any federal crimes that’s already committed except in cases of impeachment. Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon even tho he was never charged with crimes. Now the constitution never explicitely said they can pardom themselves, but maybe the supreme court would let him.