• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    191 month ago

    Completely ignoring the infant mortality rates going up have you? What’s the matter? Doesn’t fit your narrative?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      -191 month ago

      255 more dead infants vs 50,000 saved. Magnitudes more have been saved than those lost.

      Fits my narrative pretty good.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        171 month ago

        And yet zero discussions on how to improve the quality of life of those 50,000 babies. How to make sure they are healthy and grow up to be functioning adults.

        You don’t care about the babies. You care about control. You’re disgusting.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          -221 month ago

          So you think if life isn’t perfect, we should murder them? Do you not understand how evil that is?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              121 month ago

              Of course he doesn’t, he just follows the talking points. Gotta have those unwanted babies to grow up and fill those unwanted jobs what with the mass deportation and all. It was never about caring for children or they would support programs that actually help children, like education, TANF, food stamps, free school lunches, Medicare, all the things that help these children survive. They don’t even bother questioning why their politicians get hung up on abortion but neglect the other things. /rant

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              -161 month ago

              Pathetic? Says the guy who thinks 255 is a bigger number than 50,000. You should go back to kindergarten.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 month ago

        What are your thoughts on sacrificing an individual for their organs? Could save 5+ lives with one sacrifice.

        Good trade? Any other moral issues beyond the math here?