Summary

Walmart is scaling back its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts amid conservative backlash and changing cultural pressures.

The company removed LGBTQ-themed items, stopped sharing data with advocacy groups, and phased out supplier diversity programs and its Center for Racial Equity, created in 2020.

Walmart also rebranded its diversity roles, though it will continue funding events like Pride parades under stricter guidelines.

Activists opposing DEI policies, like Robby Starbuck, have praised these changes.

  • FaceDeer
    link
    fedilink
    432 months ago

    This decision was no doubt motivated by the exact same question that made them put that merchandise up in the first place: “what will result in us earning more profit?”

    • @samus12345
      link
      English
      12
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’d like to see hard data on whether or not being “anti-woke” generates more profit. I’ve never seen evidence that it does.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 months ago

        It’s the perfect excuse to cut back on funding expenditures and increase cronyism, and that’s all the justification that they need.

        • @samus12345
          link
          English
          42 months ago

          Have corpos ever needed an excuse for that? This seems more like thinking that Americans in general will reward them for being “anti-woke.”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            52 months ago

            No, but having it be justified by a portion of the population with violent tendencies makes it easy to avoid getting in trouble with the law for doing. You say that you’re getting rid of worker safety programs and bringing back child labor, and people start asking questions. You say that the children yearn for the mines but the woke won’t let them, and half the country will start punching elementary teachers for not letting kids get Black Lung.

            Basically, it’s a combo of the two. They get to do the things that they want to do anyway, and they get support from a group of people trying to destroy regulations simply for doing it.

          • @Doomsider
            link
            32 months ago

            I think it may be silly to repeat their made up words. Let’s just call them classist, racist, and sexist since that is what it really is.

            “Americans in general will reward them for being classist, racist and sexist.”

            Yeah, I like that. It is a lot more visceral and accurate.

            • @samus12345
              link
              English
              22 months ago

              Less succinct, but indeed more clear. But you have to add things like transphobic and homophobic as well.

              • @Doomsider
                link
                4
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Oof, you’re right, I forgot about those and they are definitely part of the issue.

                Maybe we could use bigotry here.

                “Americans in general will reward them for their bigotry”

                • @samus12345
                  link
                  English
                  22 months ago

                  Yeah, that’s a good word for it.