Wayland and audio is fixed, but only on the canary branch for the moment, this isnt lazy either, they changed the whole screenshare flow to suit linux’s permission prompts

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    161
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I was almost convinced they were keeping this broken on purpose, it’s been broken so long. Like, years long.

    It was broken so long I honestly wouldn’t have been surprised if news surfaced that Discord was taking back-handers from Microsoft under the table to keep it broken. With steam working so well on Linux now, broken discord streaming without actual working audio share was one of the last things that posed a hurdle for gamers ditching Windows.

    (In the meantime, thank you Vesktop for your service <3)

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      614 days ago

      I saw something from a discord dev (can’t find it, so grain of salt) about how there was interest recently to do it, but they’d have to work on other stuff that affected everyone first, and they’d probably get it done by q4 2024, guess they were right.

      I think before then the whole linux graphics and audio space hadn’t really stabilized enough for them to be interested.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      213 days ago

      It was broken so long I honestly wouldn’t have been surprised if news surfaced that Discord was taking back-handers from Microsoft under the table to keep it broken.

      Tech companies are fully capable of being lazy for free. Fixing this takes dev time from other work that brings Discord money so doing this costs them, especially considering that Linux userbase must be rather tiny. 99% of software companies don’t give a shit about making quality product and will always try their hardest to do as little work as possible while making as much money as possible. If fixing a bug will cost them more than potential profits from making it work then they won’t fix it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        33 days ago

        You’re right of course, it’s definitely down to simple lack of incentive, rather than some kind of conspiracy. But the conspiracy was a fun shower thought! :)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      264 days ago

      convinced they were keeping this broken on purpose, it’s been broken so long. Like, years long.

      Heh. There’s a ticket with Splunk. It’s a simple request: do the 30 sec of work to let us install your software rpm from a proper yum repo.

      They can’t figure out how.

      They won’t ask.

      It’s 12 years old now.

      The ticket for them to do a trivial exercise with tools twice as old, is now a tween. It can ride the bus on its own. I think it can get a Facebook account. Maybe.

      We should get one for it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            23 days ago

            I had weird issues with the Flatpak (can’t remember what they were) but the native RPM worked fine. Previously you had to download and install/update the RPM manually but I’ve heard they’re working on proper RPM and deb repos.

      • @tehfishman
        link
        24 days ago

        Is there really? Long time splunk admin, I would love to see this

    • @kuneho
      link
      103 days ago

      You give them too much credit. It’s just shitty, that’s it.

      Discord is pretty much broken on all platform. It always was. There’s just no real alternative unfortunately.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          33 days ago

          If Twitter is any indication, Discord would have to fuck up big, and for a long time for people to switch.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 days ago

            I agree, but working on an alternative an cultivating it could be a good start. Look at mastodon or lemmy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          33 days ago

          There is an alternative people have used before discord came, it is called teamspeak. Is still around as well, but works more like a federated system since everyone has to set up and host their own server for people to use.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              23 days ago

              Discord isnt open source either tho so how does that matter for the comparison?

              And while yes it is a little outdated, I do recall the time before discord when people would have their own teamspeak server instead, which worked very similar to the fediverse.

              You had the client and could connect to any server you had the credentials to, which each were owned and hosted by various people or groups each with their own rules and code of conduct.

        • @kuneho
          link
          13 days ago

          I’m all for it tho I have no idea how to grab the folk’s attention

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 days ago

            We would have to sit down and actually think what an opensource solution can achieve and how it gets traction. Also from the get go it should be clear that there will be no feature parity between it and discord. If it was me, I would cut out the whole chatroom functionality, leave private messaging in, use threaded conversations as a standard and but a decent videocall system on top. But this would be my version of it, other people have other needs.

            For the video call system you would not have to reinvent the wheel, use something existing like Jitsi (?) or alternatives. Then you would

            Maybe the best bet is to look at matrix and wrench out the chatroom focus and replace it with threads?

            • @kuneho
              link
              33 days ago

              best alternative would be a forum + voice calls + dms IMO

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                23 days ago

                Not in my bubble, chats create insurmountable loads of noise. By focusing on threads you get the discussion much more focused and streamlined. Example: Most of my discords are ttrpg related, where with the usage of bots games are scheduled. Or where discussion are happening around certain ttrpg systems.

                I agree that a lot of discord servers focus on chat rooms. But you could retain that by simply having 1-2 chatrooms per server and structure/direct conversations to dedicated threads/voice chats instead.

                Again this is just MY view. I am totally aware that other people, use it differently.

                • @[email protected]OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  23 days ago

                  that’s a totally fair view, and the people at matrix seem to agree because it has threading, seems to be the kind you like, too

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    13 days ago

                    No, matrix is still very focused on chat room sadly and for the video conferencing you need to use jitsi as far as I am aware, at least thats how we’ve set it up at work. The thread function in discord is much better actually.

    • riquisimo
      link
      fedilink
      23 days ago

      I like how Vesktop updates in the background. Discord proper has to close, download the .deb, install, and relaunch.