• queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 month ago

    Anarchism can’t defend itself. That’s the point. Either it gets coopted and recuperated under capital, or it gets hijacked by reactionary forces for their own purposes.

    • Zloubida
      link
      English
      71 month ago

      While Marxism-Leninism gets hijacked by reactionary forces for their own purposes and gets recuperated under capital after that.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        The USSR lost the Cold War, but there’s plenty of ML counties still around. I’m sure you’ll whine they aren’t paradises, but they’re all generally progressing and developing in a positive direction (when they aren’t being strangled to death like Cuba)

        Not a lot of anarchist spaces by comparison. There’s the Zapatistas and they’re pretty cool, but like, the record is pretty clear.

        • Zloubida
          link
          English
          91 month ago

          And before the end of the cold war, USSR was a reactionary country governed by an elite for its own interests. It’s the same in China. The same in Vietnam, the same in Cuba (but at least there they have the excuse of the unjust US politics against them).

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Eliminating homelessness, eliminating illiteracy, eliminating hunger, increasing life expectancies, increasing graduation rates, increasing quality of life, actually existing socialist countries accomplish incredible things (some more than others, admittedly). They’re not perfect utopias, but you can’t ignore the context they exist within (i.e. they’re still developing countries and they exist within US global hegemony)

            I’m sure you have some specific criticisms of China or Cuba or whatever, but they’re doing pretty fucking good considering what they’re up against.

            While you keep on dreaming of utopia, I’m more concerned with defeating than US empire in the real world. Anarchism can’t.

            • Zloubida
              link
              English
              51 month ago

              Capitalist countries did the same thing without building walls to stop their population to flee…

              • queermunist she/her
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                Not a single capitalist country has eliminated homelessness. Why is that? Why are life expectancies falling in the US?

                Also, Berlin is in the middle of East Germany.

                The wall was to separate what was basically an island of Western control from the rest of East Germany. It was kind of a weird political situation.

                • Zloubida
                  link
                  English
                  01 month ago

                  USSR “solved” homelessness putting people in prisons and psychiatric hospital… and even then there still was homeless people. Authoritarianism doesn’t work.

                  And Berlin west was a weird political situation, but my argument still holds. People flee DPRK or China…

                  • queermunist she/her
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    The US puts more people in prison than the USSR ever did, yet its homeless population is huge.

                    And there isn’t a giant wall around China lol