• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 month ago

    Can’t really have an open federated protocol if you want to be able to prevent scraping 🤷

    • BETYU
      link
      fedilink
      21 month ago

      the protocol might be open but joining your own server is not open so not really like the fediverse.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Weelll, depends on what you mean with “joining your own server.” The model is definitely different from ActivityPub’s, but lots of people on the network already have their own PDSs or “personal data servers”. They do still go through Bluesky’s relay, but nothing is really stopping people from running relays as such, it’s just fairly costly (as in some hundreds of dollars per month) currently as they need to hold the full state and history of the network (but apparently that’s being worked on.)

        But it’s definitely a federated protocol even though it’s different from AP

        • BETYU
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          but you kind of said yourself that in practice its not really.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                So just because someone else isn’t running a relay now while they figure out how to make them less costly to run, it’s pointless for the protocol to be partially federated already and support further federation?

                • BETYU
                  link
                  fedilink
                  113 days ago

                  its centrally controlled that makes it pointless. if BitTorrent was centrally controlled that would also make it pointless. it does not matter what the protocol can do if a central point can control who can use it.