Summary

Australia has passed a groundbreaking ban on social media use for children under 16, the strictest of its kind globally.

Platforms like X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, and Reddit have one year to implement the age limit, with fines up to AU$50M for non-compliance.

Supporters cite mental health concerns, while critics argue the ban risks isolation for marginalized youth, lacks proper research, and excludes harmful platforms like 4chan.

Privacy concerns surround proposed age-verification methods. Opponents, including parents, scholars, and tech companies, argue the legislation is rushed and poorly designed, potentially exacerbating existing issues.

  • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    An Australian Senate committee signed off on the legislation late Tuesday but said social media platforms should find “alternative methods for assuring age” rather than forcing users to submit personal information such as their passports or other digital identification.

    Like? You think letting these same companies you see as a threat to kids to come up with their own verification method is a good plan? LOL

    Edit - lost words somehow

    • @Evotech
      link
      918 hours ago

      Are you over 16? Click yes

    • @CriticalMiss
      link
      217 hours ago

      How do you assure age without personal identification? It’s funny that they signed on the bill but only know how they don’t want to force it, without any ideas or alternatives. I got no love for Meta but I’m really wondering what can you possibly implement?

      Oh and also, VPN. GG.

      • @JeremyHuntQW12
        link
        17 hours ago

        Read it again.

        What it actually says is that SM sites can collect personal ID, but must provide an alternative.

    • kamenLady.
      link
      119 hours ago

      At least you have words available to lose. I lost all my words already.