@5SpeedDeasil to [email protected] • 1 year agoRandom internet people explaining math better then math teacheri.imgur.comimagemessage-square198arrow-up11.74Karrow-down162cross-posted to: math
arrow-up11.68Karrow-down1imageRandom internet people explaining math better then math teacheri.imgur.com@5SpeedDeasil to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square198cross-posted to: math
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink17•1 year agoYou can reduce this readable code into one line of confusing python list comprehension that runs 100x slower!
minus-square@0xfflink8•1 year agoWhat’s wrong with list comprehensions? Do I just have Stockholm Syndrome at this point? I would skip the square brackets and just use a generator expression: sum(3*n for n in range(5)).
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•1 year agoYes, the classic readability of c style for loops. How about some Haskell let numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] let sumOfNumbers = sum numbers
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 year agoI don’t think you can use python list comprehensions in this case, since you don’t want a new list, but rather reduce it to a single value.
You can reduce this readable code into one line of confusing python list comprehension that runs 100x slower!
What’s wrong with list comprehensions? Do I just have Stockholm Syndrome at this point?
I would skip the square brackets and just use a generator expression:
sum(3*n for n in range(5)).Yes, the classic readability of c style for loops.
How about some Haskell
let numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] let sumOfNumbers = sum numbers
I don’t think you can use python list comprehensions in this case, since you don’t want a new list, but rather reduce it to a single value.