@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • 19 days agoNew powder that captures carbon could be ‘quantum leap’ for industrywww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up131arrow-down15cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up126arrow-down1external-linkNew powder that captures carbon could be ‘quantum leap’ for industrywww.theguardian.com@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • 19 days agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@A_AlinkEnglish6•edit-219 days agoPlants are many other of magnitude better than this. Consider this result they got (and how expensive it must be) : from : https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08080-x
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-217 days agoYes, Rock Stored Carbon is less impactful compared to say Land Stored Carbon (Biomass burial, Paulownia, Bamboo) Good thing there are people working on all different Carbon Capture methods.
minus-square@A_AlinkEnglish1•18 days agohuh ? Jup Rock ? … is this chalk ? (we do know most carbon on Earth is stored in rocks … maybe we could call them carbonate rocks ?)
Plants are many other of magnitude better than this.
Consider this result they got (and how expensive it must be) :
from :
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08080-x
Yes, Rock Stored Carbon is less impactful compared to say Land Stored Carbon (Biomass burial, Paulownia, Bamboo)
Good thing there are people working on all different Carbon Capture methods.
huh ? Jup Rock ? … is this chalk ?
(we do know most carbon on Earth is stored in rocks … maybe we could call them carbonate rocks ?)
See edit