@jeffwM to News • 2 months agoElizabeth Warren calls for crackdown on Internet “monopoly” you’ve never heard ofarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square38arrow-up1263arrow-down18cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1255arrow-down1external-linkElizabeth Warren calls for crackdown on Internet “monopoly” you’ve never heard ofarstechnica.com@jeffwM to News • 2 months agomessage-square38cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 months agoIt would be weird if it did because .d means directory
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 months agoI never said they were. I just said .d means directory in another context
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 months agoWell, a .com is a CP/M binary file introduced in ~1975, whereas the TLD wasn’t introduced until 1985. So, put that in your pipe and smoke it. 😝
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 months agoYeah that’s weird too. So would a TLD of .txt or .doc or can you imagine a TLD of .html? They’re all weird just to various degrees. Why would you want .d as a TLD? To me it would just be weird and confusing.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 months ago.a, .b, .c… Why are they limiting us? Seems like ICANN has an unfair position. Someone should start a competing dns that allows domain registrations with single letter domains. That’s kind of how .onion works (for dns)
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 months agoYou haven’t answered why somebody would want these confusing tlds
It would be weird if it did because .d means directory
When does .d mean directory?
In UNIX
But TLDs are not “UNIX”
I never said they were. I just said .d means directory in another context
Well, a .com is a CP/M binary file introduced in ~1975, whereas the TLD wasn’t introduced until 1985. So, put that in your pipe and smoke it. 😝
Yeah that’s weird too. So would a TLD of .txt or .doc or can you imagine a TLD of .html?
They’re all weird just to various degrees.
Why would you want .d as a TLD? To me it would just be weird and confusing.
.a, .b, .c…
Why are they limiting us? Seems like ICANN has an unfair position.
Someone should start a competing dns that allows domain registrations with single letter domains.
That’s kind of how .onion works (for dns)
You haven’t answered why somebody would want these confusing tlds