• @Maalus
    link
    English
    108 days ago

    Western styles weren’t meant to combat heavily armored units. You aren’t getting through heavy armor with a sword. Unless you use it as a mace (mordhau) or use it as a dagger by half-swording(grabbing the middle of your blade to act more like a dagger) and getting through the squishy bits. At which point, why not use an actual dagger. Also, there are loads of manuals talking about fighting unarmored opponents while you are also not wearing armour.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 days ago

      fighting against armored opponents != fighting through armor, the fighting style is designed to target specific points that are exposed on armored opponents, making the style less practical against unarmored, hence like you mentioned, there’s a different manual on it. the fact that there’s a completely different manual on it shows the practicality of how different weapons are under different conditions, hence why there really isn’t any realistic scenario where it’s on any even playing field, because fixing the rules will give the edge to one style over the other.

      • @Maalus
        link
        English
        28 days ago

        I said different manual, but it is more of a “different chapter in the same book”. There is a shitload of practicioners of the unarmored parts - that’s what people train mostly as HEMA. “Armoured” fighting is more problematic since it often involves having to throw your opponent, or other dangerous shit. Also not many people can afford full plate / the plastic equivallent.

        If you wanted to see a HEMA vs japanese martial arts, all it takes is getting two people who do each together.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Grabbing the sword at the middle point was a commonly used technique, as was striking with the pommel or crossbar. Real sword fights looked very different than what we see in movies. There’s a video out there that displays a lot of the actual techniques used by medieval knights, but unfortunately I can’t find it now. It was much more physical, brutal, and effective than the flashy techniques we’ve come to associate with swordfighting.

      • @Maalus
        link
        English
        17 days ago

        You are literally saying the exact moves I mentioned in my comment. I practiced HEMA, I know.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
          link
          English
          17 days ago

          Well you said “you’re not getting through armor with a sword unless you do these things”, and I was saying “yes, those are things they commonly did”. So they are getting through armor with a sword because they did do those things.

          • @Maalus
            link
            English
            27 days ago

            They did those things only if they had to and there was no other way, as a “backup”. They used different weapons for that - maces, warhammers and such. Also, it was worth more to isolate the knight and capture them - so they could ransom them back or use their kit - the armor, weapons etc.

            They absolutely aren’t a counter to heavily armoured opponents. Maces and hammers are.

            • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
              link
              English
              17 days ago

              True. Some of those hammers were ingenuous too, with edges that looked like can opener blades.