• ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    I under stand the human desire to compete in wealth as a [genitalia] measuring contest, but there should probably be a cap somewhere…

    Maybe a cap at somewhere between 500K and $10Mil, I’m not sure where, but someone else fancy enough to write laws should maybe figure it out… cuz any amount higher kinda make no sense.

    Oh and redistribute the excess as a UBI that everyone would get.

    I don’t like the bandwagon of “kill billionaires”. Like why need to kill when we can just seize excess funds that they don’t need and redistribute, everyone can just chill.

    • @Kryptenx
      link
      613 days ago

      The guillotines solve for the issue of using hoarded capital to tie up seizures in endless legal proceedings.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        I don’t hate guillotines, but I’m more afraid of non-rich people getting falsely labeled as collaborators and also getting executed.

        Once you start killings, you can’t really control who is next in getting killed. I just want to seize assets and call it a day.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      113 days ago

      500k is absurdly low these days to be considered rich. Thats like a house in the midwest, or around half a house in cali

      Unless the real estate bubble pops, which I have no faith in happening anytime soon.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        I mean like, I said somewhere between 500K to 10Mil. I’m no expert, but maybe someone experienced in the economy would decide where to draw the line.