This is a genuine question.
I have a hard time with this. My righteous side wants him to face an appropriate sentence, but my pessimistic side thinks this might have set a great example for CEOs to always maintain a level of humanity or face unforseen consequences.
P.S. this topic is highly controversial and I want actual opinions so let’s be civil.
And if you’re a mod, delete this if the post is inappropriate or if it gets too heated.
That’s disgusting.
Now i want to pin purple heart on him.
Your morals are oversimplified to the point of being wrong
I’m not wrong. Murder is wrong.
and thus proving their point. congrats.
If the point was murdering the innocent CEO was wrong, then yes.
yes we know you’re a useful idiot. dont need to keep advertising it.
When you insult someone it demonstrates that you have nothing useful to add. Blocking you.
appreciated!
The CEO lived by the sword and died by the sword. The amount of suffering and death needed to feed that pig…
There were no swords involved. He was murdered for no reason.
In the US, if your insurance say no to your claim you can die, pay out of pocket, or hope its not that bad and you survive.
The company he ran has a record of saying no 30% of the time. That’s a lot of dead people that guy signed off on to pinch a penny. He earned it.
=)))))))
You’re unwittingly defending a profiteering murderer
No I’m not.
Is it tho… Is it?