@ccunning to No Stupid Questions • 2 months agoIf billionaires and CEOs feel like they need to start paying for large security details, would that be an example of trickle down economics?message-square70arrow-up1365arrow-down121
arrow-up1344arrow-down1message-squareIf billionaires and CEOs feel like they need to start paying for large security details, would that be an example of trickle down economics?@ccunning to No Stupid Questions • 2 months agomessage-square70
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-15•2 months ago To be fair, trump was a candidate / forner president at the time, not the sitting president nor president-elect. Red herring. The USSS probably just let their guard down and didn’t expect anyone to try anything. Minimization. Ad hominem is usually next. But, you instead could choose to answer the question in good faith.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•2 months agoBit early in the thread for one word retorts and assumptions of bad faith isn’t it? I’m not even sure what’s supposed to be being argued right now.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•2 months agoNo, it’s not. If there’s no logic in the foundation then what’s built upon it is nearly useless.
Red herring.
Minimization.
Ad hominem is usually next. But, you instead could choose to answer the question in good faith.
Bit early in the thread for one word retorts and assumptions of bad faith isn’t it? I’m not even sure what’s supposed to be being argued right now.
No, it’s not. If there’s no logic in the foundation then what’s built upon it is nearly useless.