Summary

Trump announced plans to end birthright citizenship via executive action, despite its constitutional basis in the 14th Amendment.

He also outlined a mass deportation policy, starting with undocumented immigrants who committed crimes and potentially expanding to mixed-status families, who could face deportation as a unit.

Trump said he wants to avoid family separations but left the decision to families.

While doubling down on immigration restrictions, Trump expressed willingness to work with Democrats to create protections for Dreamers under DACA, citing their long-standing integration into U.S. society.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1003 days ago

    i wish everyone would get rid of the assumption that the constitution will protect you

    “that’s unconstitutional!!!” doesn’t mean jack shit anymore

      • @Dkarma
        link
        223 days ago

        Yeah just like roe overturn didn’t happen 🙄

        • JackFrostNCola
          link
          English
          12 days ago

          Ok ok, so maybe it will happen, but it surely won’t affect me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        They’ll deny it until it is happening and they feel safe to admit they believed him and wanted it to happen.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yup. This exact shit has essentially destroyed my relationship with my parents. I can only ignore the repugnant politics for so long and up to a certain point before I have to reconsider if I want that hatred and bigotry in my life.

    • WideEyedStupid
      link
      12
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’ve noticed many Americans also talk about those ‘unalienable rights’ like it’s some law of nature. They’re not unalienable. Having rights is not a given. Ask many groups of people throughout history. You only have rights as long as others respect them. Where are your unalienable rights when you’re grabbed off the street in a black van and taken somewhere without anyone knowing? When your fellow citizens / your government decides you shouldn’t have them anymore? If rights were unalienable, why are they dependent on borders?

      Sometimes I think people feel too safe. Otherwise they wouldn’t accept others losing their rights so easily. They still think they won’t/can’t lose their own.

      • @WhatYouNeed
        link
        22 days ago

        The constitution is more what you’d call “guidelines” than actual rules.