That does not address a single thing I said. Don’t change the subject. I was talking about vigilantism, not insurance claims.
Your bloodlust for killing the innocent when it is “necessary” is noted.
How many innocent people it is acceptable to kill per CEO? 1? 10? 100? 1000? What’s the maximum number here you’ll accept? How about if someone throws a bomb on top of a CEO in the middle of a city and it kills everyone around him? Acceptable? What if the CEO is with their baby at the time and the baby gets shot too? Fine to shoot a baby as long as the CEO dies?
I want to know where your line is, but I have a feeling you’ll try to change the subject again rather than respond.
That does not address a single thing I said. Don’t change the subject. I was talking about vigilantism, not insurance claims.
Your bloodlust for killing the innocent when it is “necessary” is noted.
How many innocent people it is acceptable to kill per CEO? 1? 10? 100? 1000? What’s the maximum number here you’ll accept? How about if someone throws a bomb on top of a CEO in the middle of a city and it kills everyone around him? Acceptable? What if the CEO is with their baby at the time and the baby gets shot too? Fine to shoot a baby as long as the CEO dies?
I want to know where your line is, but I have a feeling you’ll try to change the subject again rather than respond.
We’ve reached an impasse, readers can make up their own minds on this topic.
I knew you wouldn’t tell me where the line was.
I can only assume you’re fine with a baby getting gunned down in the service of your war.
Are you doing Israel’s beheaded babies trick to win an online argument?
Unhinged
No. I am not. Nice try attempting to paint me as a Zionist though. You wouldn’t be the first to try that nonsense.