Phil to

[email protected]English • 1 year ago

A LessWronger writes /16500/ words on why they are definitely not trans.

unremediatedgender.space

6

5

A LessWronger writes /16500/ words on why they are definitely not trans.

unremediatedgender.space

Phil to

[email protected]English • 1 year ago

6

Sexual Dimorphism in Yudkowsky's Sequences, in Relation to My Gender Problems ★ The Scintillating But Ultimately Untrue Thought

unremediatedgender.space

I'll write my way out Write everything down, far as I can see I'll write my way out Overwhelm them with honesty This is the eye of the hurricane This is the only way I can protect my legacy —

It will not surprise you at all to find that they protest just a tad too much.

See also: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ZjXtjRQaD2b4PAser/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning

Chat

PhilOP
link
fedilink
English
1•
edit-2
1 year ago
I accidentally interacted with them on Twitter. Argh.

[email protected]

[email protected]

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

[Especially don’t debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

2 users / day
61 users / week
231 users / month
2.09K users / 6 months
969 subscribers
324 Posts
7.75K Comments
Modlog