• @A7thStone
        link
        51 month ago

        You answered you’re own question.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
        link
        -11 month ago

        Honestly if you can’t go shoplift a copy tomorrow and find five things you like about it, you’re a hack and miserable prick.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          If you’re suggesting there is value to be found in the New York times, I haven’t seen any in a couple of decades. Of course I almost never try to read that paper these days, but on the rare occasions that I do it’s just a waste of time. There’s nothing interesting at all.

    • @zergtoshi
      link
      English
      11 month ago

      That depends on who looks at it, too.
      It can very well be seen as all bad, why wouldn’t it?

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
        link
        11 month ago

        Because that’s idiotic. The crossword puzzle is “bad” too? You can’t learn anything from a single one of their articles?

        Writing off the entire thing as “all bad” is based on your emotional feelings about the NYT, not any rational or factual reasoning.

        • @zergtoshi
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          I didn’t say that I perceive the whole of NYT as bad. In fact I didn’t say anything about how I perceive the NYT at all.
          I was merely trying to explain that such a subjective assessment may be very different from subject to subject doing the assessment.
          You can very well find good things in NYT based on your own emotional feelings.

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
            link
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Okay I get that, everyone has different taste.

            They don’t like the font, too?

            The weather reports are bad?

            If someone can’t find a few nice things to say about anything they’re a cunt, you may not know this yet but it is true.