• @jordanlund
    link
    101 month ago

    277 people… over 25 years. It’s statistically insignificant on a population of 300 million people.

    By point of comparison:

    https://www.cpsc.gov/Newsroom/News-Releases/2023/Nearly-Half-of-Incidents-with-Kids-and-Corded-Window-Coverings-Resulted-in-Death-GoCordless-to-Save-Lives

    “On average, about nine children under 5 years of age die every year from strangling in window blinds, shades, draperies and other window coverings with cords.”

    So 225 over 25 years. Again, not statistically significant.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      -41 month ago

      A child dying from something that could have been prevented cannot be dismissed as a simple statistical insignificance. That’s the most cynical thing I’ve heard in a while.

      • @jordanlund
        link
        71 month ago

        Individual tragedies are never going to be prevented. You might as well mandate kids exist in giant hamster balls 24/7.

        Oh, but then they might suffocate.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          -11 month ago

          It’s perfectly preventable in other countries. In the western world, this is pretty much a uniquely American experience.

          • @jordanlund
            link
            21 month ago

            You can’t undo the 2nd amendment, there are over 400 million guns in the country.

            The fact that there are only 11 deaths per year on a population of 400 million guns shows just how insignificant the problem is.

            It’s not even a “1 in a million” kind of thing.

            It’s a 1 in 36 million kind of thing.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              41 month ago

              It seems Trump has no problem advocating for undoing the 14th Amendment to ban birthright citizenship. If he does that, I see no problem undoing the 2nd Amendment.

              • @jordanlund
                link
                2
                edit-2
                30 days ago

                Yeah, no amendment can be undone in the current climate.

                Doing it requires 290 votes in the House, a body that last needed 15 tries to get a 218 vote simple majority to decide who their own leader will be.

                Then you need a 67 vote majority in the Senate, a body that’s blocked from doing anything by a 60 vote majority to break a filibuster.

                If by some miracle, both of those things happen, then the change needs to be ratified by 38 states.

                In the last election, Trump won 31 states, so he’d need 7 Harris states to back him on repealing an amendment. Aint happening.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 month ago

            We should ban seat belts, then. Theres a non-zero chance that they could trap you in a car in a crash leading to your death. Never mind that the chance is statistically insignificant.

            Also, do other countries mandate this safety feature?

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Seat belts are designed specifically to save people’s lives. In action, they prevent a lot more deaths than they cause. Firearms are designed specifically to take people’s lives. In action, they cause a lot more deaths than they prevent.