@[email protected] to [email protected] • 21 hours agoSpot the differencelemmy.mlimagemessage-square157fedilinkarrow-up1358arrow-down1167
arrow-up1191arrow-down1imageSpot the differencelemmy.ml@[email protected] to [email protected] • 21 hours agomessage-square157fedilink
minus-square@Plastic_Ramseslink-6•edit-210 hours agoI just dont like billionaires in any form wether or not they work as “adapters”. The article is just long form “the west has them, so we should have them”. Billionaires arent under the peoples control. they’re under the control of a dictator.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]linkfedilink9•10 hours agoIt isn’t, actually. It attempts to examine why the PRC has them in the first place.
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilink7•9 hours agoThey skimmed it for talking points, ain’t no way a person with such surface level opinions can analyze that article in 5 minutes lmao
I just dont like billionaires in any form wether or not they work as “adapters”.
The article is just long form “the west has them, so we should have them”. Billionaires arent under the peoples control. they’re under the control of a dictator.
It isn’t, actually. It attempts to examine why the PRC has them in the first place.
They skimmed it for talking points, ain’t no way a person with such surface level opinions can analyze that article in 5 minutes lmao
Of course, hence my pointing out their mistake.