David GerardM to [email protected]English • 2 days ago"Sam Altman is one of the dullest, most incurious and least creative people to walk this earth."deadsimpletech.commessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up1197arrow-down12cross-posted to: stuffandsuch
arrow-up1195arrow-down1external-link"Sam Altman is one of the dullest, most incurious and least creative people to walk this earth."deadsimpletech.comDavid GerardM to [email protected]English • 2 days agomessage-square94fedilinkcross-posted to: stuffandsuch
minus-squareknightly the SneptaurlinkfedilinkEnglish-7•1 day agoLol, using a survey to try and claim that your argument is “supported by data”. Of course the people who use Big Autocorrect think it’s useful, they’re still using it. You’ve produced a tautology and haven’t even noticed. XD
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•1 day agoit may be a shock to learn this, but asking people things is how you find things out from them I know it requires speaking to humans, alas, c’est la vie
minus-squareknightly the SneptaurlinkfedilinkEnglish-3•1 day agoIt may be a shock to learn this, but asking people things is how you find out what they think, not what is true. I know proof requires more than just speaking to humans, alas, c’est la vie.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•1 day agodid you know the report also publishes the details of its analysis methodology? my god, where are you people coming from today
minus-squareknightly the SneptaurlinkfedilinkEnglish-3•edit-21 day agoDid you know that all reputable surveys publish their methodology? Did you know that, regardless of how you analyze the results, a survey is still just a survey? If LLMs were worth the hype then you’d have actual proof of utility, not just sentiment.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•1 day agoThis is a pretty funny interaction when you realise that you just misread the froztbyte’s self-reply (and the survey) as pro-AI, so you were just aggressively agreeing with each other all along
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•edit-21 day ago(why I was not as harsh as in earlier comments)
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•1 day ago If LLMs were worth the hype then you’d have actual proof of utility you think I’m promptfan-posting? impressive.
minus-squareDavid GerardOPMlinkfedilinkEnglish10•1 day agochrist, did someone fire up the Batpromptfondler signal
Lol, using a survey to try and claim that your argument is “supported by data”.
Of course the people who use Big Autocorrect think it’s useful, they’re still using it. You’ve produced a tautology and haven’t even noticed. XD
it may be a shock to learn this, but asking people things is how you find things out from them
I know it requires speaking to humans, alas, c’est la vie
It may be a shock to learn this, but asking people things is how you find out what they think, not what is true.
I know proof requires more than just speaking to humans, alas, c’est la vie.
did you know the report also publishes the details of its analysis methodology?
my god, where are you people coming from today
Did you know that all reputable surveys publish their methodology?
Did you know that, regardless of how you analyze the results, a survey is still just a survey?
If LLMs were worth the hype then you’d have actual proof of utility, not just sentiment.
This is a pretty funny interaction when you realise that you just misread the froztbyte’s self-reply (and the survey) as pro-AI, so you were just aggressively agreeing with each other all along
(why I was not as harsh as in earlier comments)
you think I’m promptfan-posting? impressive.
christ, did someone fire up the Batpromptfondler signal