@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 months agoBig loss for ISPs as Supreme Court won’t hear challenge to $15 broadband lawarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up196arrow-down11cross-posted to: politics[email protected]
arrow-up195arrow-down1external-linkBig loss for ISPs as Supreme Court won’t hear challenge to $15 broadband lawarstechnica.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square11fedilinkcross-posted to: politics[email protected]
minus-squarePossibly linuxlinkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoI personally don’t care for the government fixing prices but at the same time I can’t really feel bad for ISPs.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•2 months agoWorth noting that they wouldn’t exist at all without eminent domain to run the cables. They’re inherently public infrastructure no matter how they present themselves.
minus-squarePossibly linuxlinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoHonestly the government should just rent the back end infrastructure.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•2 months agoI’m definitely on team “eminent domain the cables back”. None of them have used the privilege for the benefit of the public.
I personally don’t care for the government fixing prices but at the same time I can’t really feel bad for ISPs.
Worth noting that they wouldn’t exist at all without eminent domain to run the cables.
They’re inherently public infrastructure no matter how they present themselves.
Honestly the government should just rent the back end infrastructure.
I’m definitely on team “eminent domain the cables back”. None of them have used the privilege for the benefit of the public.