In a Dec. 10 order, made public by the Article III Project on Tuesday, Diaz concluded that by publicly criticizing a Supreme Court justice’s ethics Ponsor’s essay diminished the public’s confidence in the judiciary’s integrity.
Yeah! The Supreme Court can diminish the public’s confidence in the judiciary’s integrity perfectly fine on their own! We don’t need you point their literal lack of ethics!
Pointing out a lack of ethics is unethical.
This ruling alone does more to diminish the integrity of the justice system than any 1000 judges criticizing a SC justice’s lack of ethics. It is ethical to criticize a lack of ethics.