@[email protected] to United [email protected]English • 2 months agoStarmer must protect elections from foreign interference, says watchdog | Party fundingwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up153arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up153arrow-down1external-linkStarmer must protect elections from foreign interference, says watchdog | Party fundingwww.theguardian.com@[email protected] to United [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish13•2 months agoHe should also get rid of FPTP now. If he doesn’t, the sane vote will be split Lab, Green, Lib and maybe Plaid, SNP and maybe Con. While the nutty vote all goes to Reform and they get in with like less than a third of the vote.
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoWhat voting system would be a better fit, for a better reflection of voter preference?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•2 months agoPreferential voting for the Lower House (of Commons), Proportional voting for the Upper House (of Lords).
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoMy preference is score/range voting. Then there is no vote splitting.
He should also get rid of FPTP now. If he doesn’t, the sane vote will be split Lab, Green, Lib and maybe Plaid, SNP and maybe Con. While the nutty vote all goes to Reform and they get in with like less than a third of the vote.
What voting system would be a better fit, for a better reflection of voter preference?
Preferential voting for the Lower House (of Commons), Proportional voting for the Upper House (of Lords).
My preference is score/range voting. Then there is no vote splitting.